I was searching for images from The Dark Knight when I came upon your post on Maggie Gynllenhaal and how you said she wasn't attractive and made a fuss as to why she was in the movie. I thought that was incredibly superficial and shows what an idiot you are. It's not that I care if you think she's attractive or not, but that you would be so whiny about her level of attractiveness or not.
First of all, it's all about peace, bro. Second of all, "Rushmore" is about as gangsta as you can get. And third of all...
Hey, I don't care that Maggie Gyllenhaal is ugly either, and that wasn't my point. My point is if you expect me to enjoy a movie, don't cast Maggie Gyllenhaal as the girl who is being fought over by the two coolest, most handsome men in Gotham. That's not realistic! Now, if she's playing "the ugly duckling best friend" or "ugly girl #2" or "the mangled half of two face's face", then she's perfect!
5 comments:
can we at least get a WESTSIDE "signage"?
It's hard to look gangsta while standing in front of a framed Rushmore poster.
I was searching for images from The Dark Knight when I came upon your post on Maggie Gynllenhaal and how you said she wasn't attractive and made a fuss as to why she was in the movie. I thought that was incredibly superficial and shows what an idiot you are. It's not that I care if you think she's attractive or not, but that you would be so whiny about her level of attractiveness or not.
To the Anonymous above.....you are the IDIOT.
First of all, it's all about peace, bro. Second of all, "Rushmore" is about as gangsta as you can get. And third of all...
Hey, I don't care that Maggie Gyllenhaal is ugly either, and that wasn't my point. My point is if you expect me to enjoy a movie, don't cast Maggie Gyllenhaal as the girl who is being fought over by the two coolest, most handsome men in Gotham. That's not realistic! Now, if she's playing "the ugly duckling best friend" or "ugly girl #2" or "the mangled half of two face's face", then she's perfect!
Post a Comment